Resource Allocation Discussion
During a cross-functional team meeting, the project manager needs to negotiate for additional resources (e.g., personnel, budget, equipment) or resolve resource conflicts between different sub-teams or ongoing projects. This requires clear justification and persuasive communication.
Dialogue
Listen and follow along with the conversation
Vocabulary
Essential words and phrases from the dialogue
cross-functional
Involving people from different departments or areas of a company to work together on a project, like in this meeting with teams from design and other areas.
resource allocation
The process of deciding how to distribute people, money, or tools to different parts of a project, such as assigning designers to tasks.
stretched thin
An idiom meaning a team or person is very busy and has too much work, making it hard to take on more, like Emma's team with their project.
re-prioritize
To change the order of importance of tasks, so you focus on what's most urgent first, often used in project planning to manage time.
critical path
In project management, the sequence of tasks that must be completed on time to finish the whole project, delaying them affects everything.
reallocate
To move resources like budget or staff from one area to another to meet new needs, such as shifting money for a contractor.
deliverables
The specific results or products that a team promises to complete in a project, like reports or designs, which must be handed over.
Key Sentences
Important phrases to remember and practice
It's come to light that the UI/UX design phase is more complex than anticipated.
This sentence uses 'come to light' to mean 'become known' and compares 'more complex than anticipated' to explain unexpected difficulties; useful for describing surprises in projects and practicing comparative structures.
We need an additional senior designer for at least three weeks to meet the revised deadline without compromising quality.
Here, 'additional' means extra, and the infinitive 'to meet... without compromising' shows purpose; it's practical for requesting resources in meetings, highlighting time and quality balance.
Pulling someone from my team right now would definitely impact our deliverables there.
This uses conditional 'would... impact' to predict negative effects; great for negotiating by explaining consequences, common in team discussions to protect priorities.
Is there no way to re-prioritize some tasks within the Phoenix project to free up internal resources?
A rhetorical question suggesting alternatives with 'is there no way' to politely probe ideas; useful for brainstorming solutions in collaborative settings, using infinitives for purpose like 'to free up'.
We've explored both. Re-prioritizing internally would delay other critical path items.
Starts with 'We've explored' to show prior efforts, then conditional for outcomes; helpful for responding in negotiations, emphasizing why options won't work with project terms like 'critical path'.
That would be fantastic! That gives us exactly what we need.
Exclamatory for positive agreement, with 'gives us' in present simple for immediate benefits; ideal for expressing thanks in meetings and confirming solutions enthusiastically.
Sarah, could you coordinate with David and Lisa to ensure a smooth transition?
Polite request using 'could you' for suggestions, with 'to ensure' showing purpose; practical for assigning follow-up actions in team meetings to maintain progress.