Situations
Choose from 6 conversations to practice
Defining Core Concepts
Participants begin by attempting to establish common ground and clarity on the fundamental terms and concepts relevant to the philosophical topic at hand, often leading to initial disagreements on definitions.
Presenting Initial Arguments
Individuals or groups articulate their primary positions and the foundational arguments supporting their views on the philosophical problem, often referencing different philosophical schools of thought.
Challenging Premises and Assumptions
Participants actively probe the underlying premises, assumptions, and logical structures of others' arguments, identifying potential fallacies or weak points through critical questioning.
Constructing Counterarguments and Rebuttals
Debaters formulate and present specific counterarguments to refute opposing viewpoints, offering alternative perspectives or new evidence to strengthen their position.
Exploring Ethical or Societal Implications
The discussion shifts to consider the real-world ethical, moral, or societal consequences and implications of different philosophical positions, moving beyond abstract theory.
Seeking Synthesis or Remaining in Aporia
Participants attempt to find common ground, synthesize different ideas into a new understanding, or acknowledge the irresolvable complexities and limitations of reaching a definitive conclusion (aporia).