Situations
Choose from 6 conversations to practice
Opening Arguments on Ethics
Two participants present their initial positions and foundational arguments on a given ethical dilemma, such as utilitarianism vs. deontology, or the ethics of AI.
Challenging Metaphysical Assumptions
Debaters question each other's underlying metaphysical assumptions about reality, existence, or consciousness, attempting to expose logical inconsistencies or weaknesses.
Responding to Counter-Arguments
Participants engage in a nuanced exchange, directly addressing counter-arguments and critiques to their initial propositions, often leading to deeper philosophical exploration and clarification.
Applying Philosophical Concepts to a Case Study
The debate shifts to applying abstract philosophical concepts (e.g., justice, freedom, responsibility) to a specific real-world or hypothetical case study, analyzing its implications.
Critiquing Logical Fallacies
One debater points out and explains the presence of a logical fallacy (e.g., ad hominem, straw man, false dilemma) in the opponent's argument, challenging its validity.
Formulating a Synthesis or Conclusion
At the debate's conclusion, participants attempt to summarize their main points, draw a final conclusion, or offer a potential synthesis of the discussed ideas, sometimes a concession or a call for further inquiry.