情境
选择 6 个对话s 进行练习
Opening Arguments on Ethics
Two participants present their initial positions and foundational arguments on a given ethical dilemma, such as utilitarianism vs. deontology, or the ethics of AI.
两名参与者就一个给定的伦理困境（如功利主义与义务论，或人工智能伦理）提出他们的初步立场和基本论点。
Challenging Metaphysical Assumptions
Debaters question each other's underlying metaphysical assumptions about reality, existence, or consciousness, attempting to expose logical inconsistencies or weaknesses.
辩论者质疑彼此关于现实、存在或意识的潜在形而上学假设，试图揭示逻辑不一致或弱点。
Responding to Counter-Arguments
Participants engage in a nuanced exchange, directly addressing counter-arguments and critiques to their initial propositions, often leading to deeper philosophical exploration and clarification.
参与者进行细致的交流，直接回应针对其最初主张的反驳和批评，这通常会促使更深入的哲学探讨和澄清。
Applying Philosophical Concepts to a Case Study
The debate shifts to applying abstract philosophical concepts (e.g., justice, freedom, responsibility) to a specific real-world or hypothetical case study, analyzing its implications.
辩论转向将抽象的哲学概念（例如，正义、自由、责任）应用于一个具体的现实或假设案例研究，并分析其含义。
Critiquing Logical Fallacies
One debater points out and explains the presence of a logical fallacy (e.g., ad hominem, straw man, false dilemma) in the opponent's argument, challenging its validity.
一个辩论者指出并解释对手论点中存在的逻辑谬误（例如，人身攻击、稻草人谬误、虚假两难），质疑其有效性。
Formulating a Synthesis or Conclusion
At the debate's conclusion, participants attempt to summarize their main points, draw a final conclusion, or offer a potential synthesis of the discussed ideas, sometimes a concession or a call for further inquiry.
在辩论结束时，参与者尝试总结他们的主要观点，得出最终结论，或对所讨论的想法提出可能的综合，有时是让步或呼吁进一步探究。